Senator Madrigal, NDFP
push for accelerated peace talks
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
October 13, 2007 Updated Oct. 18, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Amsterdam, 13 October) Philippine Senator Jamby Madrigal, chair of the Senate Committee on Peace, Unification and Reconciliation. and Luis G. Jalandoni of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines signed yesterday a historic joint statement, pushing for the resumption of formal talks and acceleration of peace negotiations between the armed revolutionaries of the NDFP and the Manila government within the presidential term of Gloria M. Arroyo, or even after. ■ Click here for ABS-CBN Interactive news features
|
|
|
|
|
| (L-R): Atty. Michiel Pestman, Sen. Madrigal and Prof. Sison | |
|
Photos courtesy of PPT on Philippines 2-Intl Coordinating Secretariat |
|||||
|
Senator Madrigal, NDFP push for
accelerated peace talks
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Sen. Madrigal with Luis Jalandoni and Prof. Sison
|
Prof. Sison with Atty. Jan Fermon
|
||||
|
An earlier activity was the forum on:
"REPRESSION AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION UNDER THE PRETEXT OF ANTI-TERRORISM"
with the following main
speakers: and the Case of Prof. Jose Maria Sison |
Reactors:
League of Peoples' Struggle |
||||
|
JOINT STATEMENT OF
SEN. M. A. MADRIGAL
members each, to discuss the three remaining
items (social and economic reforms, political and constitutional reforms
and end of hostilities and disposition of forces) and produce within one
5. Senator Madrigal welcomed the declaration of the NDFP that it
She added that as an alternative to creating a committee of experts,
she would instead hear Senate Resolution No. 89, which she authored,
concerning the review of the status of negotiations between the GRP and
NDFP and create a Technical Working Group to assist in hastening the
resolution of the remaining items in the substantive agenda of the
GRP-NDFP peace negotiations for the purpose of enacting remedial
legislation, thus demonstrating that it is possible to produce agreements
and actually use these to accelerate the progress and success of the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations. The meetings of the Technical Working Group
shall be held in venues deemed appropriate for its purpose. |
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
![]()
|
|||||
|
Senator M.A. Madrigal
Luis G. Jalandoni
For the Negotiating Panel the Philippines
|
|||||
|
Review and Updates on the Peace Process between the GRP and the NDFP
Paper presented by Atty. Edre U. Olalia NDFP-Joint Secretariat Legal Consultant during the Philippine Ecumenical Peace Platform (PEPP) Luzon Regional Consultation Workshop, Subic Bay, Zambales, Philippines, October 11, 2007 [1]
The National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) considers the peace negotiations between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and the NDFP to be ongoing and what is suspended are the formal meetings of their negotiating panels.
The NDFP also firmly affirms that all agreements signed with the GRP remain binding and effective. The Joint Monitoring Committee (JMC), which was established in February 2004 as mandated by the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) entered into by the two parties back in March 1998, continues to function, albeit presently not as fully and effectively as it was envisioned.
Prior to the break in the formal meetings, there have been several indications that support the NDFP position that the GRP is not negotiating in good faith.
In July 2004, upon learning that the entire Marcos ill-gotten wealth held in escrow had been transferred to the GRP treasury the previous March, the NDFP strongly criticized the move. A significant portion of the amount was supposed to be earmarked for the indemnification of the human rights victims of the dictatorship.
The NDFP also raised the issue of the release of political prisoners, the worsening and increasing number of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, and the GRP’s failure to resolve the issue of the ‘terrorist' listing of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), the New People’s Army (NPA) and the NDFP Chief Political Consultant, Prof. Jose Ma. Sison.
The NDFP considers these issues as prejudicial questions that should be settled before formal negotiations can resume. While they do not constitute as preconditions for the resumption of the formal meetings, they need to be addressed and resolved priorly before any meaningful and principled negotiations can realistically be expected or achieved between the parties. After all, these have |
been agreed upon, among others, in the Oslo I and II Joint Statements of February and April 2004, respectively. The NDFP is simply asking the GRP to comply with its previous commitments and abide by existing agreements.
To further compound matters, the US government released a new list of so-called foreign terrorist organizations and individuals in August 2004. The list still included the CPP, NPA and Prof. Sison. These prompted the NDFP Negotiating Panel to postpone the formal talks... The postponement was a move to give the GRP ample time to comply with its obligations in accordance with The Hague Joint Declaration, the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG), the CARHRIHL and the Oslo Joint Statements I and II.
The GRP, however, in December 2004 formally suspended the formal talks in the negotiations. In August the following year, it also whimsically and unilaterally suspended the JASIG. The so-called JASIG suspension – which is not allowed by its provisions for being anathema to its objectives - essentially put the peace negotiations in limbo. The NDFP maintains that the JASIG remains valid and binding, and that the peace negotiations are ongoing because neither of the negotiating parties has terminated the JASIG and consequently the peace negotiations.
For its part, the NDFP has done its best to break the impasse and to ensure that the peace talks continue. The NDFP has submitted concrete proposals for this purpose, among them are the paper entitled Responding to Prejudicial Questions, Accelerating Peace Negotiations through Informal Meetings of Special Representatives of the Principals (June 2005); the 10-point Concise Agreement for an Immediate Ceasefire (August 2005); and the NDFP Package of Proposals (November 2005).
Instead of meeting the efforts of the NDFP halfway, the GRP virtually suspended the peace negotiations when, in February 2006 at the height of Mrs. Macapagal-Arroyo’s issuance of an authoritarian Proclamation 1017 or a “state of emergency,” it concocted rebellion charges against Prof. Sison, NDFP Panel Chairperson Luis Jalandoni; NDFP Panel members Fidel Agcaoili and Juliet Sison; and some NDFP Panel consultants.
The GRP’s Department of Justice also attacked the integrity of the NDFP-Nominated Section of the Joint Secretariat by recklessly identifying its office as the supposed address of many of the individuals it charged with a hodgepodge of various acts of rebellion, including those who are publicly known to be in the underground movement.........
|
||||
Sen Madrigal jump starts peace talks with the communistsUN: Counter-insurgency strategy explains extrajudicial killings in PhilippinesSison: Actions vs NDFP Panelists Could Destroy Peace Talks | Bulatlat
|
ABS-CBN Interactive
The
government-NDF
peace talks was
also assisted by Norway acting as a
...
to assist in hastening the resolution of the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations for the
...
|
||||
| BONUS TRACKS | |||||
![]() |
◄ Meeting in Utrecht in June, 2006 | ||||
| ► Send us your feedback ◄ | |||||